For schools, universities and courses
Your students already use AI. Now you can see the path to the answer.
Eidovia is the teaching platform for the age of AI. Students use AI in their own work, within the school’s rules; teachers see every prompt, every adjustment and every agent, and assess the reasoning, not just the final work.
Illustration with fictional data: a student’s Source research agent, with its four-step plan and the trace of its run; at one step the student adjusted the result and added Maria Leopoldina, as the assignment asks.
The landscape
AI is already in the classroom. Assessment hasn’t caught up.
- 26%
Banning it doesn’t work
In a fall 2024 survey, 26% of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 said they use ChatGPT for their schoolwork, double the share in 2023.
- 94%
Allowing it without criteria outsources the thinking
94% of UK undergraduates use generative AI to support assessed work. Without seeing the process, the grade measures the tool, not the person.
HEPI and Kortext, Student Generative AI Survey 2026 (Mar. 2026) (opens in a new tab)
- 36%
Teachers need support too
On average across OECD countries, 36% of lower secondary teachers report having used AI in their work. Among those who haven’t, 75% say they lack the knowledge and skills to teach with it.
Eidovia brings AI into teaching, with clear rules and evidence of the reasoning.
How it works
Three steps, from the assignment to the assessment.
Teachers create assignments, papers and exams
With or without help from AI, they write the instructions, set the due date, attach references and choose the tools. AI can stay out, have limited use or be open, within the limit the school sets for each level of schooling. Exams start with undergraduate and graduate programs.
Students work with AI
They generate text, slides and other files, search for references within the limit and scope the school and the teacher set, and build agents, one at a time or connected on a canvas. In an assignment without AI, the due date, the instructions and the submission work the same way.
The teacher assesses the reasoning
Eidovia records the student’s prompts, the adjustments they make to what the AI returns and the agents they build. The teacher assesses how each prompt was built and the final result. The rubric only suggests; the teacher decides.
Illustration with fictional data: the timeline of Ana Ribeiro’s History assignment in grade 9A, in four lanes — student, AI, sources and agent — over six days, with 14 AI prompts and 3 adjustments the student made to what the AI returned.
Agent Studio
Students build the agent. You assess the reasoning behind it.
- Design
- Run
- Adjust
- Submit
Using AI well is already a skill. In the Agent Studio, students design agents for their work: they set the goal, the role, a step-by-step plan and the tools the teacher has enabled, and they can connect one agent to another on a canvas. Then they run them, adjust what stays from each step and hand in everything: the agents, the trace and the reflection.
For the school
The school follows along by class, by teacher and by student.
- Classes
- Teachers
- Students
- Goals and plans
School leaders follow AI use and how assignments are going for each class, each teacher and each student, with several ways to view and analyze it. They also create activity plans and goals for the school and choose the AI model, including one from a license the school already has. The goal is that, in this new era of AI, teaching moves forward together with these tools. Each student’s care alerts stay with the class’s teachers; school leaders see how many are open in each class, without the student’s name or what they wrote.
Protection
Designed for minors, with protection by design.
- Care, not punishment
- Privacy by design
- Measured, not promised